Tosefta for Chullin 95:14
אנן אדרבא מתנינן לה דאמר רבא
In our case the test is reasonable, for we could thereby assume that the disorder was caused by the wall, in which case the animal would be permitted; but in that case [of Raba, what is the point of the test? ] If this lobe is found to be perforated the animal is trefah, and if the other lobe is found to be perforated it is also trefah.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And there certainly was a perforation in one of the lobes for only that could have caused the adhesion. Of course the reason why the water does not bubble is that a membrane had formed over the perforation.');"><sup>7</sup></span>
Explore tosefta for Chullin 95:14. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.