יד וטעמא דרבנן משום הכי הוא והתניא אמרו לו לרבי יהודה והלא מרביעין עליה ויולדת אלמא משום עובריה הוא
14 [it is allowed,] how much more so in the case of a whole animal where he has not severed all connection with it?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since the animal itself belongs to the Israelite and is not yet pregnant, and when the offspring is born, it will be in the possession of the heathen.');"><sup>23</sup></span> You can put this query to the Rabbis, thus: are we to say that the Rabbis only prohibit in the case of a maimed [animal] because he severs all connection with it,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The selling her is complete and, therefore, there is the fear that one might sell also a whole animal to a heathen.');"><sup>24</sup></span> but in the case of a whole animal, where he does not sever his connection from the animal, it is permissible; or are we perhaps to say that if in the case of a maimed [animal], where he will not come to confuse it [with another animal], they forbid [the selling to a heathen,] how much more so in the case of a whole animal, is there the fear [of confusion.]<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For another animal, where the selling is complete and the Israelite has no share in the animal, unlike the circumstances in our query, where the animal still belongs to the Israelite and there is as yet no offspring.');"><sup>25</sup></span> But is the reason of the Rabbis because of what [is stated] here?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' So that the above query naturally arises.');"><sup>26</sup></span>