טו <big><strong>גמ׳</strong></big> קשיא ליה לרבי ישמעאל הא חסר אשך מיבעי ליה תני שנמרחו אשכיו קשיא ליה לרבי עקיבא האי ממרוח אשך מיבעי ליה תני שהרוח באשכיו
15 <big><b>MISHNAH: </b></big>IF HE HAS NO STONES AT ALL OR ONLY ONE STONE, THIS IS THE BIBLICAL MEROAH ASHEK.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. XXI, 20; E.V. 'he that hath his stones broken'.');"><sup>26</sup></span> R'ISHMAEL SAYS: IF HE HAS HIS TESTICLES CRUSHED.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' This is the biblical meroah.');"><sup>27</sup></span> R'AKIBA SAYS: IF HE HAS WIND IN HIS TESTICLES. R'HANINA B. ANTIGONUS SAYS: [MEROAH ASHEK MEANS]: IF HE HAS A BLACK COMPLEXION.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The blemishes mentioned in the Mishnah disqualify a priest from the priesthood according to all the Tannaim, and the difference of opinion is only with reference to the precise interpretation of the words meroah ashek.');"><sup>28</sup></span> <big><b>GEMARA: </b></big>R'Ishmael [who differs from the opinion of the first Tanna in the Mishnah] found this opinion difficult to accept, [for if so], 'it ought to read: Hasar ashek.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If the first Tanna were correct, that the Bible means that the testicles were absent, then it should have said hasar etc., i.e., deficient in testicles. jrunn jrunn');"><sup>29</sup></span> Therefore he teaches: IF HE HAS HIS TESTICLES CRUSHED. R'Akiba also [who in turn differs from R'Ishmael] found this opinion difficult to accept, [for if so], it ought to read: Memarah ashek.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If R. Ishmael's interpretation were correct. participle passive is required, v. Jast. cur. edd. , is difficult to explain grammatically. jur');"><sup>30</sup></span> He therefore teaches: IF ONE HAS WIND IN HIS TESTICLES.