ב כי פליגי היכא דמת האב בתוך שלשים יום רב חסדא אמר הבן חייב לפדות את עצמו דהא לא זכה אביו לפדיונו רבה בר רב הונא אמר אין הבן חייב לפדות עצמו דאמר ליה אתינא מכח גברא דלא מצית לאשתעויי דינא בהדיה
2 all agree that the son is not obliged to redeem himself, for his father has acquired possession of his redemption [money].<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For even if the father had set aside the five sela's, being a priest he could have taken them for himself. Since therefore his father acquired the redemption money he leaves it to his son, together with his other estate.');"><sup>4</sup></span> The point at issue however is where the father dies within the thirty days. R'Hisda says: The son is obliged to redeem himself, since the father did not acquire possession of his redemption.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For since he died before the redemption was due, his father did not acquire the redemption money at all so that the son might inherit it.');"><sup>5</sup></span> But Rabbah son of R'Huna said: The son is not obliged to redeem himself, for he can say to the priest: 'I come on the strength of a man with whom you cannot go to law'.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' 'Because if my father were alive, you could not claim the five sela's. For if he died within the thirty days of my birth, there is no obligation to redeem, and if after the thirty days, then my father acquired possession of the redemption money, seeing that he was a priest himself and I have inherited it. Consequently coming in his place. I claim exemption'.');"><sup>6</sup></span> We have learnt: OR IF SHE BECAME A PROSELYTE WHEN PREGNANT,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And she had never born children previously.');"><sup>7</sup></span>