Chullin 112
הוריקה כבד כנגד בני מעיים מהו
- Raba answered: Since the part of the liver which lies in front of the entrails ha turned green, one can be certain that the bird had fallen into the fire and its internal organs had been scorched; it is therefore trefah.
כיון שהוריקה כבד כנגד בני מעיים בידוע שנפלה לאור ונחמרו בני מעיים וטרפה:
But we have learnt: IF THEY TURNED GREEN IT IS INVALID! - They said: IF THEY TURNED GREEN IT IS INVALID, only with regard to the gizzard, the heart, or the liver<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., in respect of those organs only which are normally red.');"><sup>6</sup></span>
באלו בני מעיים אמרו בקורקבן בלב ובכבד
But we have learnt: IF THEY REMAINED RED IT IS VALID! - He replied, [The rule is:] If organs which are normally red turned green, or organs which are normally green turned red [it is trefah]; for they said: IF THEY REMAINED RED IT IS VALID, only with regard to the heart, the gizzard, or the liver.
רבי יצחק בר יוסף הוה ליה ההוא תרנגולתא שדרה לקמיה דרבי אבהו וא"ל
R'Samuel B'Hiyya said in the name of R'Mani: If organs which are normally red turned green [on the hen falling into the fire], but after being cooked turned again to red, it is valid.
לא אמרו אדומין כשרים אלא בלב בקורקבן ובכבד
Therefore, said R'Ashi, one should not eat [a hen that had fallen into the fire] without first cooking the internal organs.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For the symptoms might appear in the organs only after the cooking.');"><sup>8</sup></span>
אמר רב שמואל בר חייא אמר רבי מני
But this is not right, for we do not assume any taint [without cause].<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' So that as long as there are no evident symptoms of scorching we must not assume any taint in the condition of the bird.');"><sup>9</sup></span>
אמר רב נחמן בר יצחק אף אנן נאמר
R'Eleazar B'Antigonos said in the name of R'Eleazar son of R'Jannai: In each case the bird must be examined.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., even where it continued alive for twenty-four hours it must nevertheless be examined in order to ascertain that the spinal cord has not been severed.');"><sup>10</sup></span>
אדומין שלא הוריקו ושלקן והוריקו טרפה מאי טעמא
<big><b>MISHNAH: </b></big>AND THE FOLLOWING [DEFECTS] DO NOT RENDER BIRDS TREFAH: IF THE WINDPIPE WAS PIERCED OR SLIT LENGTHWISE; IF A WEASEL STRUCK IT ON THE HEAD IN SUCH A PLACE AS WOULD NOT RENDER IT TREFAH;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' l.e., in any part of the head not immediately above the brain. For the meaning of 'struck' v. 2upra p. 305, n. 7.');"><sup>11</sup></span>
ולא היא אחזוקי ריעותא לא מחזקינן:
<big><b>GEMARA: </b></big>Our Rabbis taught: It is related of R'Simai and R'Zadok that when they were on their way to Lydda in order to intercalate the year they spent the Sabbath at Ono,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' A village about three miles to the north of Lydda, mentioned in Ezra II, 33. Its modern name is Kefr Ana. thgcht');"><sup>13</sup></span>
א"ר אלעזר בן אנטיגנוס משום רבי אלעזר בר' ינאי
It was asked: Does it mean, they ruled that if the womb was gone it was forbidden.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' MS.M. reads 'permitted'. This reading is preferred by Tosaf. s.v. .');"><sup>14</sup></span>
<big><strong>מתני׳</strong></big> ואלו כשרות בעוף
Or, does it mean, they ruled that if the womb was gone it was permitted just as Rabbi rules concerning the crop, but in the case of the crop they do not agree with Rabbi's ruling?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The question is really this: Did they make two decisions, one affecting the womb and the other the crop, or did they only make one decision and that with regard to the womb?');"><sup>15</sup></span>
הכתה חולדה על ראשה מקום שאינו עושה אותה טרפה
Rabbah, others say R'Joshua B'Levi, said: The top of the crop is regarded as the gullet.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' So that the slightest perforation there would render the bird trefah.');"><sup>16</sup></span>
ניקב הזפק רבי אומר
Where is this? - R'Bibi B'Abaye said: It is that part of the crop at which point it begins to elongate.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'all that stretches with it', i.e., with the oesophagus. It refers to the point at which the crop begins to taper and to form into the tube of the oesophagus.');"><sup>17</sup></span>
יצאו בני מעיה ולא ניקבו
R'Samuel B'R'Isaac said: The Mishnah refers only to the case where they were not twisted<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Because this would cause a deterioration and finally a perforation of the intestines (Tosaf.) lbbufhu');"><sup>18</sup></span>
נשתברו גפיה נשתברו רגליה נמרטו כנפיה
[when put back], but if they were twisted [when put back] it would be trefah, for it is written: Hath He not made thee and established thee?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Deut. XXXII. 6. Heb. ,uhbbuf');"><sup>19</sup></span>
איבעיא להו
wherein all [classes] are to be found: out of them come their priests, out of them their prophets, out of them their princes, out of them their kings, as it is written: Out of them shall come forth the corner-stone, out of them the stake etc.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Zech. X. 4.');"><sup>22</sup></span>
תיקו
[The gentile] thereupon brought the son [of the victim] and by an optical illusion made out as if he slaughtered him in the presence of the father.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The purpose of this trick was to horrify him so terribly as to cause him to take in a deep breath and draw in his entrails, thus they would be replaced without the aid of the hand of man.');"><sup>24</sup></span>