Kiddushin 12

Chapter 12

א לא אמר ולא כלום אמר לה לשפחתו הרי את מותרת לכל אדם לא אמר ולא כלום
1 his words are null.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Because this expression applies only to liberation from bondage.');"><sup>1</sup></span> If he says to his female slave, 'Thou art permitted to all men,' his words are [likewise] null.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Because this applies to divorce.');"><sup>2</sup></span>
ב אמר לה לאשתו הרי את לעצמך מהו מי אמרינן למלאכה קאמר לה או דילמא לגמרי קאמר לה
2 [But] what if he says to his wife, 'Behold, thou art for thyself,' do we say, he meant it in respect of labour; or perhaps he meant it absolutely?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In the sense of divorce.');"><sup>3</sup></span> - Said Rabina to R'Ashi: Come and hear: For we learnt: The essential part of a deed of manumission is, 'Behold, thou art a free man,' 'Behold, thou art for thyself.'
ג א"ל רבינא לרב אשי ת"ש דתניא גופו של גט שחרור הרי אתה בן חורין הרי אתה לעצמך השתא ומה עבד כנעני דקני ליה גופיה כי א"ל הרי אתה לעצמך לגמרי קא"ל אשה דלא קני ליה גופה לא כ"ש
3 Now if a heathen<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'Canaanite.'');"><sup>4</sup></span> slave, whose body belongs to him [his master], yet when he says to him, 'Behold, thou art for thyself,' he means it absolutely; how much more so in the case of a wife, who does not belong bodily to him.
ד א"ל רבינא לרב אשי אמר לעבדו אין לי עסק בך מאי מי אמרינן אין לי עסק בך לגמרי קא"ל או דילמא למלאכה קאמר ליה
4 Rabina asked R'Ashi: What if he says to his slave, 'I have no concern with you'? Do we say, he means, 'I have absolutely no concern with you;'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., you are free.');"><sup>5</sup></span>
ה א"ל ר"נ לרב אשי ואמרי לה רב חנין מחוזאה לרב אשי ת"ש המוכר עבדו לעובד כוכבים יצא לחירות וצריך גט שחרור מרבו ראשון
5 or perhaps he says it to him in reference to work? - R'Nahman observed to R'Ashi-others state, R'Huna of Hoza'ah<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' [Be Hozai, the modern Khusiztan, S.W. of Bagdad. V. Git. (Sonc. ed.) p. 413, n. 1.]');"><sup>6</sup></span> to R'Ashi: Come and hear: If one sells his [heathen] slave to a heathen, he is emancipated,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' A Gentile slave in a Jewish household was practically a semi-Jew, being obliged to fulfil those precepts which are incumbent on women. The master who sold him to a Gentile, thus freeing him from that obligation, was punished by being forced to buy him back, even at a greatly enhanced price, and the slave then became free.');"><sup>7</sup></span>
ו אמר רשב"ג בד"א שלא כתב עליו אונו אבל כתב עליו אונו זהו שחרורו ה"ד אונו אמר רב ששת דכתב ליה כשתברח ממנו אין לי עסק בך :
6 and requires a deed of manumission from his first master.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' To be accounted a free man and a Jew - as a slave he was circumcised-that he might marry a free Jewess.');"><sup>8</sup></span> Said R'Simeon B'R'Gamaliel: When does this hold good?
ז אמר אביי המקדש במלוה אינה מקודשת בהנאת מלוה מקודשת ואסור לעשות כן מפני הערמת רבית
7 If he [the vendor] did not make out for him an oni;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Prob. = Gr. '**.');"><sup>9</sup></span> but if he did, that is his [deed of] emancipation.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And nothing else is needed.');"><sup>10</sup></span>
ח האי הנאת מלוה ה"ד אילימא דאזקפה דאמר לה ארבע בחמשה הא רבית מעלייתא הוא ועוד היינו מלוה
8 What is meant by 'oni'? - Said R'Shesheth: If he wrote for him, 'When you escape from him [the heathen buyer], I have no concern with you.'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' This proves that the expression connotes freedom.');"><sup>11</sup></span> Abaye said: If a man betroths [a woman] with a debt,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Saying, 'Thou art betrothed unto me by the debt you owe me.');"><sup>12</sup></span>
ט לא צריכא דארווח לה זימנא :
9 she is not betrothed;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Because something must be actually given as kiddushin or betrothal, whereas money formerly lent had already passed into her possession before then.');"><sup>13</sup></span> with the benefit of a debt,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The meaning of this is discussed below.');"><sup>14</sup></span>
י אמר רבא הילך מנה על מנת שתחזירהו לי במכר לא קנה באשה אינה מקודשת בפדיון הבן אין בנו פדוי
10 she is betrothed; yet this may not be done, as it constitutes an evasion of usury.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since the lender thereby benefits from the loan.');"><sup>15</sup></span> This 'benefit of a debt,' how is it meant?
יא בתרומה יצא ידי נתינה ואסור לעשות כן מפני שנראה ככהן המסייע בבית הגרנות
11 Shall we say, that he fixed [the interest] as a loan, he having said, [I am lending you] four [zuz] for five.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And he now offers the remission of the fifth zuz for kiddushin.');"><sup>16</sup></span> - but that is real usury!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Not merely an evasion.');"><sup>17</sup></span>
יב מאי קסבר רבא אי קסבר מתנה על מנת להחזיר שמה מתנה אפילו כולהו נמי ואי קסבר לא שמה מתנה אפילו תרומה נמי לא
12 Moreover, it is, in point of fact, a debt!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' [Since she owes him the zuz which he offers to remit as kiddushin.]');"><sup>18</sup></span> - This holds good only if he extended the term [for repayment].<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Rashi and others: If the creditor extended the period of repayment to the woman, and said to her, 'You might have given money to a third party, or to myself, to persuade me to this extension; hence by this extension I, on my own accord, am saving you this expenditure and thus confer a financial benefit upon you here and now, and by that benefit I betroth you.' Similarly, if he remits the entire debt and says to her, 'I betroth you by the benefit that has now accrued to you by this remission,' his declaration is valid. But when he betroths her with money owing, he is offering a past benefit, hence the betrothal is invalid. R. Tam: If a woman owes money, and a third party gives the creditor a sum of money for an extension, and betroths her with that benefit which he has conferred upon her, for which he has actually given something.');"><sup>19</sup></span>
יג ועוד הא רבא הוא דאמר מתנה על מנת להחזיר שמה מתנה דאמר רבא הילך אתרוג זה על מנת שתחזירהו לי נטלו והחזירו יצא ואם לאו לא יצא
13 Raba said: [If he says,] 'Take this maneh<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. Glos.');"><sup>20</sup></span> on condition that you return it to me,' - in respect to purchase, he acquires no title;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. infra 26a; real estate is acquired by money, but not if it is stipulated that the money shall be returned.');"><sup>21</sup></span>
יד אלא אמר רב אשי בכולהו קני לבר מאשה לפי שאין אשה נקנית בחליפין א"ל רב הונא מר בריה דרב נחמיה לרב אשי הכי אמרינן משמיה דרבא כוותיך :
14 in the case of a woman,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If it was offered as kiddushin.');"><sup>22</sup></span> she is not betrothed; in the matter of a redemption of the firstborn,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'son,' v. Ex. XIII, 13.');"><sup>23</sup></span>
טו אמר רבא תן מנה לפלוני
15 the firstborn is not redeemed: in respect of terumah,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. Glos. If terumah is given to the priest on this condition.');"><sup>24</sup></span> he fulfils the duty of 'giving', yet it is forbidden to act thus, as it looks like a priest who ass the threshing floor.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Of an Israelite, in order to receive the terumah. The Rabbis considered this undignified, and enacted that such a priest should not receive terumah. Now, if a priest accepts terumah on this condition, he offers an inducement to the Israelite to give it to him in the future too, and therefore Raba forbade the practice, though valid if done.');"><sup>25</sup></span> What is Raba's opinion: if he holds that a gift on condition that it be returned is a val gift, then even the others too [are valid]; whilst if he holds that it is not a valid gift, then even in the cas terumah it is not [valid]? Furthermore, It was Raba who ruled: A gift on condition that it is returned is valid. For Raba said: [If one says to another,] 'Here you have this citron, on condition that you return it to me,' if [the other] takes and [then] returns it, he fulfils his duty; if not, he does not fulfil [it]!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The reference is to Lev. XXIII, 40: And ye shall take you on the first day (of the Feast of Tabernacles) the fruit of goodly trees (interpreted by the Rabbis as referring to the citron) , branches of palm trees etc. The Rabbis ruled that this 'taking' requires one's own fruit, and to this Raba alludes. If the recipient carries out the stipulation, it was his for the period of 'taking', and so he fulfils his duty; otherwise, it was not his even then, and his duty is not fulfilled. Thus Raba holds a conditional gift valid.');"><sup>26</sup></span> - But said R'Ashi: in the case of all it [the conditional gift] is valid, with the exception in that of a woman, because a woman cannot be acquired by barter.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. infra 28a; the article given as barter was generally returned, and so when money is thus given as kiddushin, it looks like barter.');"><sup>27</sup></span> R'Huna Mar, son of R'Nehemiah, said to R'Ashi: We teach in Raba's name even as you [have stated]. Raba said: [If a woman says,] 'Give a maneh to So-and-so,