ז ואימא הכי נמי חליפין איתנהו בפחות משוה פרוטה ואשה בפחות משוה פרוטה
7 What does the number of the first clause exclude, and what does the number of the second exclude?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' It is unnecessary to state, A WOMAN . . THREE WAYS . . TWO, since these are actually enumerated. The explicit statement of the number must therefore emphasize that only three ways are valid, not more. vpuj');"><sup>10</sup></span> - The number of the first clause excludes huppah.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If a father delivers his daughter to huppah as an act of betrothal (kiddushin) , it is not valid as such. (Rashi) . [The word from the root ;pj , denotes the baldachin or canopy wherein the bridegroom received the bride at the nuptials. A good deal of uncertainty exists as to the signification of this ceremony; (v. Shulhan 'Aruk, Eben ha-'Ezer, I, XV, 1) . Rashi, it appears, regards huppah as a mere symbol of traditio puellae, a handing over of the maiden by the father to the husband into whose control she now passes, (cf. Keth. 48a) , in contradistinction to Maim.,');"><sup>11</sup></span> But according to R'Huna, who maintained: Huppah [as an act of betrothal] acquires [a woman], by inferring it a minori,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. infra 50.');"><sup>12</sup></span> what does it exclude? - It excludes barter.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' A woman cannot be bartered, i.e., become betrothed in exchange for an article. - On 'barter' v. infra 28a, MISHNAH:');"><sup>13</sup></span> I might have thought, since we learn the meaning of 'taking' from Ephron's field:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra 2a.');"><sup>14</sup></span> then just as a field may be acquired by barter, so may a woman too be acquired by barter: hence we are informed [otherwise]. And let us say: That indeed is so? - Barter is possible with less than a perutah's worth;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. B.M. 47a.');"><sup>15</sup></span> whilst a woman will not cede herself [in marriage] for less than a perutah's worth.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Because it is derogatory to her dignity.');"><sup>16</sup></span>