ה לא עשה בה מאמר אינה צריכה אלא חליצה בלבד מאי אמרת תיבעי נמי מיאון שמא יאמרו אין קידושין תופסין באחותה הכל יודעים אחות חלוצה דרבנן דאמר ריש לקיש כאן שנה רבי אחות גרושה מדאורייתא אחות חלוצה מדברי סופרים
5 she needs mi'un, lest her father did not consent to the kiddushin of either the first or the second, and so it be said: Kiddushin with her sister has no validity.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As on p. 224, n. 5. - Rashi observes that even if her father consented to the kiddushin of the first but not of the second, she needs mi'un, for she is only a haluzah in respect to the second, and his kiddushin with her sister is valid, whereas on account of the divorce it will be said that her sister's kiddushin is not valid. Hence the Talmud states: 'lest her father did not consent to the kiddushin of the first' unnecessarily - probably in order to achieve symmetry of style (but v. Tosaf.) .');"><sup>7</sup></span> But if he does not make a declaration to her, she merely requires halizah. For what will you say: let her also require mi'un, lest it be said that kiddushin with her sister is no valid<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' On account of the halizah, which may be assumed to be certainly required by Biblical law.');"><sup>8</sup></span>