ב תפשוט ליה מהא דאמר עולא משום ר"ש בר יהוצדק מעשה ובלעו זאבים שני תינוקות בעבר הירדן ובא מעשה לפני חכמים וטהרו את הבשר
2 R. Simeon b. Pazzi raised the question, What is the law if an ear of corn, which had reached a third of its growth before the 'Omer, had been plucked out [before the 'Omer] and was replanted after the 'Omer when it increased its growth? Do we have regard to the stock [of the corn], and that was rendered permitted by the 'Omer; or do we have regard to the increase, and that [will be permitted] only after next year's 'Omer? - But surely the question can be solved from the following statement of R. Abbahu which he said in the name of R. Johanan: If a young shoot laden with fruit was grafted on to an old tree, even if [the fruit had as a result] increased two hundredfold. it is still forbidden. Furthermore. R. Samuel b. Nahmani said in the name of R. Jonathan, If an onion was planted in a vineyard. and the vineyard was later uprooted, even though [the onion had thereafter] increased two hundredfold, it is still forbidden? -It was [those very rulings] which caused him to raise the question. Were those Rabbis certain of the ruling that we have regard to the stock, and they would apply it to all cases whether it would lead to leniency or stringency; or perhaps they were in doubt about it, so that they applied it only to those cases which lead to stringency but not to those which lead to leniency? - This remains undecided. Raba raised the question. What is the position with regard to tithing? In what circumstances? Where, for example,