Niddah 62
והיינו דאמר רב קטינא
in order that their wives should emit their semen first so that their children shall be males, Scripture attributes to them the same merit as if they had themselves caused the increase of the number of their sons and sons' sons. This explains what R. Kattina said, 'I could make all my children to be males'. Raba stated: One who desires all his children to be males should cohabit twice in succession.
אמר רבא
further stated: A woman conceives only immediately before her menstrual period, for it is said, Behold I was brought forth in iniquity;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Ps. LI, 7. The last word is taken as an allusion to the menstruation period when intercourse is an iniquity' and the prefixed beth ('in') is rendered 'near'. ');"><sup>3</sup></span>
(תהלים נא, ז) ובחטא יחמתני אמי
'And so shall he cleanse the house'. And if you prefer I might reply: The proof is derived from the following: Purge<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Tehate'eni (cf. prev. n. but one). ');"><sup>10</sup></span>
כיון שבא זכר בעולם בא שלום בעולם שנאמר (ישעיהו טז, א) שלחו כר מושל ארץ זכר זה כר
R. Ammi further stated: When a male comes into the world his provision comes with him, [the Hebrew for] male [zakar, being composed of the consonants of the words for] 'this is provision [zeh kar]', for it is written, And he prepared a great provision [kera] for them.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' II Kings VI, 23. ');"><sup>17</sup></span>
ואמר ר' יצחק דבי רבי אמי
A female has nothing with her, [the Hebrew for] female [nekebah] implying 'she comes with nothing' [nekiyyah ba'ah]. Unless she demands her food nothing is given to her, for it is written, Demand [nakebah]<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The same consonants as those for female (nekebah). ');"><sup>18</sup></span>
(מלכים ב ו, כג) ויכרה להם כירה גדולה
R. Simeon b. Yohai was asked by his disciples: Why did the Torah ordain that a woman after childbirth should bring a sacrifice? He replied: When she kneels in bearing she swears impetuously that she will have no intercourse with her husband. The Torah, therefore, ordained that she should bring a sacrifice. (R. Joseph demurred: Does she not<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' When swearing. ');"><sup>21</sup></span>
(בראשית ל, כח) נקבה שכרך עלי ואתנה
depends on her regretting it?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' It does. Now in such a case it is only a Sage who, after satisfying himself of the sincerity of her plea, may absolve her. A sacrifice, however, has no place here at all. ');"><sup>24</sup></span>
אמר להן
And why did the Torah ordain that in the case of a male [the woman is clean] after seven days and in that of a female after fourteen days? [On the birth of a] male with whom all rejoice she regrets her oath after seven days, [but on the birth of a female] about whom everybody is upset she regrets her oath after fourteen days. And why did the Torah ordain circumcision on the eighth day?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' After birth, and not on the seventh which is the last day of uncleanness ');"><sup>27</sup></span>
מתקיף לה רב יוסף
while his father and mother are not in the mood for it.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'sad', on account of the prohibition of intercourse which remains in force until the conclusion of the seventh day. ');"><sup>30</sup></span>
והא מזידה היא ובחרטה תליא מילתא
It was taught: R. Meir used to say, Why did the Torah ordain that the uncleanness of menstruation should continue for seven days? Because being in constant contact with his wife<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'with her'. ');"><sup>31</sup></span>
שלא יהו כולם שמחים ואביו ואמו עצבים
does a man go in search of a woman and no woman goes in search of a man? This is analogous to the case of a man who lost something. Who goes in search of what? He who lost the thing goes in search of what he lost.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The rib from which Eve was built was taken from Adam. ');"><sup>36</sup></span>
תהא טמאה שבעה ימים כדי שתהא חביבה על בעלה כשעת כניסתה לחופה
Why is a woman's voice sweet and a man's voice is not sweet? He [derives his] from the place from which he was created<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' A beat upon the earth produces no note. ');"><sup>41</sup></span>
משל לאדם שאבד לו אבידה מי מחזר על מי
<b><i>MISHNAH</i></b>. THE DAUGHTERS OF THE SAMARITANS<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Kuthim, the people of Cutha and other places of Assyria who were transported to Samaria after the destruction of the northern kingdom and who combined their former idol-worship with a belief in the God of Israel (II Kings XVII, 24ff). Their descendants were for a time regarded as suspected Israelites and finally were entirely excluded from the community. ');"><sup>44</sup></span>
זה ממקום שנברא וזו ממקום שנבראת
SINCE THEY COHABIT WITH MENSTRUANTS BECAUSE [THEIR WIVES] CONTINUE [UNCLEAN FOR SEVEN DAYS] ON ACCOUNT OF A DISCHARGE OF ANY BLOOD.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Even blood that is clean. Should a discharge of clean blood on one day be followed by one of unclean on the following day, the Samaritan woman would count the seven days of uncleanness from the first day, regarding the second discharge as having occurred within the seven days of menstruation, so that on the eighth day she regards herself as clean, while as a matter of fact her uncleanness began on the second day and continues for seven days, the last of which is the eighth from the first discharge on which she is still menstrually unclean. ');"><sup>46</sup></span>
שנאמר {שיר השירים ב } כי קולך ערב ומראך נאוה
IS ONLY OF A DOUBTFUL NATURE.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' While a sacrifice and terumah are Pentateuchal. A Rabbinical rule can have no force where its observance involves interference with a Pentateuchal ordinance. ');"><sup>51</sup></span>
ואין חייבין עליהן על ביאת מקדש ואין שורפין עליהם את התרומה מפני שטומאתן ספק
even our daughters also [should in such circumstances be regarded as unclean]; and if they<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' THE DAUGHTERS OF THE SAMARITANS. ');"><sup>55</sup></span>
<big><strong>גמ׳</strong></big> ה"ד אי דקא חזיין אפילו דידן נמי ואי דלא קחזיין דידהו נמי לא
have not observed any discharge, their daughters also should not be regarded as unclean, should they? — Raba son of R. Aha son of R. Huna citing R. Shesheth replied: Here we are dealing with cases of which nothing definite is known, but since a minority exists that experience discharges, the possibility of such a discharge is taken into consideration. And who is the Tanna that<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In respect of restriction. ');"><sup>56</sup></span>