Niddah 77

Chapter 77

א ישבה לה ולא בדקה שגגה נאנסה הזידה ולא בדקה טהורה
1 IF SHE NEGLECTED TO<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'she sat and did not'. ');"><sup>1</sup></span>
ב הגיע שעת וסתה ולא בדקה הרי זו טמאה ר"מ אומר אם היתה במחבא והגיע שעת וסתה ולא בדקה הרי זו טהורה מפני שחרדה מסלקת את הדמים
2 EXAMINE HERSELF, IRRESPECTIVE OF WHETHER THE NEGLECT<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'and she did not examine'. ');"><sup>2</sup></span> WAS UNWITTING, UNDER CONSTRAINT OR WILFUL, SHE IS CLEAN. IF THE TIME OF HER REGULAR PERIOD HAS ARRIVED AND SHE FAILED TO EXAMINE HERSELF SHE IS DEFINITELY UNCLEAN.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' It being presumed that the discharge had made its appearance at the regular time. ');"><sup>3</sup></span> R. MEIR RULED: IF A WOMAN WAS IN A HIDING-PLACE<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Taking refuge from raiders or brigands. ');"><sup>4</sup></span>
ג אבל ימי הזב והזבה ושומרת יום כנגד יום הרי אלו בחזקת טומאה
3 WHEN THE TIME OF HER REGULAR PERIOD ARRIVED AND SHE FAILED TO EXAMINE HERSELF SHE IS DEFINITELY CLEAN, BECAUSE FEAR SUSPENDS THE FLOW OF BLOOD. BUT THE DAYS PRESCRIBED FOR A <i>ZAB</i> OR A ZABAH<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The seven clean days that must be counted after a confirmed zibah before cleanness is attained. ');"><sup>5</sup></span>
ד <big><strong>גמ׳</strong></big> למאי הלכתא אמר רב יהודה לומר שאינה צריכה בדיקה והא מדקתני סיפא ישבה ולא בדקה מכלל דלכתחלה בעיא בדיקה
4 OR FOR ONE WHO AWAITS DAY AGAINST DAY<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' One clean day for one unclean one, where the discharge appeared on no more than two days. ');"><sup>6</sup></span> ARE<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Though within the ELEVEN DAYS. ');"><sup>7</sup></span> PRESUMED TO BE UNCLEAN.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Unless the contrary was proved by an examination. ');"><sup>8</sup></span> <b><i>GEMARA</i></b>. In respect of what laws had this<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The first clause of our Mishnah. ');"><sup>9</sup></span>
ה סיפא אתאן לימי נדה וה"ק כל י"א בחזקת טהרה ולא בעיא בדיקה אבל בימי נדתה בעיא בדיקה ישבה ולא בדקה שגגה נאנסה הזידה ולא בדקה טהורה
5 to be stated? — Rab Judah replied: In order to lay down that no examination<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Morning and evening (cf. supra 11a). ');"><sup>10</sup></span> is required.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' After the eleven days such examination must be resumed. ');"><sup>11</sup></span> But since it was stated in the final clause, IF SHE NEGLECTED TO EXAMINE HERSELF,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' This presumably referring to the eleven days of the zibah period. ');"><sup>12</sup></span>
ו רב חסדא אמר לא צריכא אלא לר"מ דאמר אשה שאין לה וסת אסורה לשמש ה"מ בימי נדתה אבל בימי זיבתה בחזקת טהרה קיימא
6 it follows, does it not, that at the outset an examination is required? — The final clause applies to the days of the menstruation period; and it is this that was meant: THROUGHOUT ALL THE ELEVEN DAYS A WOMAN IS IN A PRESUMPTIVE STATE OF CLEANNESS<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since her flow of blood had come to an end during menstruation. ');"><sup>13</sup></span> and no examination is necessary, but during the days of her menstruation period<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Following the conclusion of the eleven days of zibah. ');"><sup>14</sup></span> an examination<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Morning and evening (cf. supra 11a). ');"><sup>15</sup></span>
ז א"ה אמאי א"ר מאיר יוציא ולא יחזיר עולמית דלמא אתיא לקלקולא בימי נדה
7 is required;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Ab initio. ');"><sup>16</sup></span> but IF SHE NEGLECTED TO EXAMINE HERSELF, IRRESPECTIVE OF WHETHER THE NEGLECT WAS UNWITTING, UNDER CONSTRAINT OR WILFUL, SHE IS CLEAN.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Only when THE TIME OF HER REGULAR PERIOD HAS ARRIVED AND SHE FAILED TO EXAMINE HERSELF IS SHE UNCLEAN. ');"><sup>17</sup></span>
ח הא מדקתני סיפא הגיע שעת וסתה ולא בדקה מכלל דבאשה שיש לה וסת עסקינן חסורי מחסרא והכי קתני כל י"א בחזקת טהרה ושריא לבעלה ובימי נדה אסורה
8 R. Hisda replied: This<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The first clause of our Mishnah. ');"><sup>18</sup></span> was only required to indicate that R. Meir's ruling that<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'but according to R. Meir who said'. ');"><sup>19</sup></span> a woman who has no regular period is forbidden marital intercourse,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Supra 12b. ');"><sup>20</sup></span>
ט בד"א באשה שאין לה וסת אבל יש לה וסת מותרת וצריכה בדיקה ישבה ולא בדקה שגגה נאנסה הזידה ולא בדקה טהורה הגיע שעת וסתה ולא בדקה טמאה
9 applies only to the days of her menstruation period, but during the days of her <i>zibah</i> she enjoys<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'stands'. ');"><sup>21</sup></span> A PRESUMPTIVE STATE OF CLEANNESS. If so,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That during the eleven days of zibah intercourse is permitted. ');"><sup>22</sup></span>
י הא מדסיפא ר"מ רישא לאו ר"מ כולה ר"מ היא וה"ק אם לא היתה במחבא והגיע שעת וסתה ולא בדקה טמאה שר"מ אומר אם היתה במחבא והגיע שעת וסתה ולא בדקה טהורה שחרדה מסלקת את הדמים
10 why did R. Meir rule: He must divorce her and never remarry her?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Supra 12b. ');"><sup>20</sup></span> — Since it is possible to be tempted<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'come'. ');"><sup>23</sup></span> to improper conduct during the days of the menstruation period. But since it was stated in the final clause. IF THE TIME OF HER REGULAR PERIOD HAS ARRIVED AND SHE FAILED TO EXAMINE HERSELF, may it not be concluded that we are here dealing with one who had a REGULAR PERIOD? — The Mishnah is defective and the proper reading is this: THROUGHOUT ALL THE ELEVEN DAYS A WOMAN IS IN A PRESUMPTIVE STATE OF CLEANNESS and is, therefore, permitted to her husband, but during the days of her menstruation period she is forbidden to him. This, however, applies only to a woman who has no regular period, but if she has a regular period she is permitted to him and only an examination is necessary. IF SHE NEGLECTED TO EXAMINE HERSELF, IRRESPECTIVE OF WHETHER THE NEGLECT WAS UNWITTING, UNDER CONSTRAINT OR WILFUL, SHE IS CLEAN. IF THE TIME OF HER REGULAR PERIOD HAS ARRIVED AND SHE FAILED TO EXAMINE HERSELF SHE IS DEFINITELY UNCLEAN. But, since the final clause is the view of R. Meir,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' His name having been given explicitly. ');"><sup>24</sup></span>
יא רבא אמר לומר שאינה מטמאה מעת לעת
11 the first one is not that of R. Meir, is it? — All the Mishnah represents the view of R. Meir and this is the proper reading: If she was not in a hiding place and the time of her regular period has arrived and she did not examine herself she is unclean, for R. MEIR RULED: IF A WOMAN WAS IN A HIDING PLACE WHEN THE TIME OF HER REGULAR PERIOD ARRIVED AND SHE FAILED TO EXAMINE HERSELF SHE IS CLEAN, BECAUSE FEAR SUSPENDS THE FLOW OF THE BLOOD. Raba replied: This<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The first clause of our Mishnah. ');"><sup>25</sup></span>
יב מיתיבי הנדה והזבה והשומרת יום כנגד יום והיולדת כולן מטמאות מעת לעת תיובתא
12 is to tell that she<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As the flow of her blood is suspended. ');"><sup>26</sup></span> does not<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' After the first discharge during these days. ');"><sup>27</sup></span> cause twenty-four hours retrospective uncleanness. An objection was raised: A menstruant,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' On the first day of her observing a discharge. ');"><sup>28</sup></span>
יג רב הונא בר חייא אמר שמואל לומר שאינה קובעת לה וסת בתוך ימי זיבתה אמר רב יוסף לא שמיע לי הא שמעתתא
13 a zabah,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' On the first day of her observing a discharge. ');"><sup>28</sup></span> and a woman who awaits day against day<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. prev. n. After three observations she also would, of course, become a zabah. ');"><sup>29</sup></span> or who is in childbirth<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As soon as the uterus opened. ');"><sup>30</sup></span> cause twenty-four hours retrospective uncleanness! — This is indeed a refutation.
יד א"ל אביי את אמרת ניהלן ואהא אמרת לן היתה למודה להיות רואה יום ט"ו (יום) ושינתה ליום כ' זה וזה אסורין לשמש שינתה פעמים ליום כ' זה וזה אסורין
14 R. Huna b. Hiyya<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Var. lec. Hiyyah b. R. Huna (Bomb. ed. and Rashi). ');"><sup>31</sup></span> citing Samuel replied: This<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The first clause of our Mishnah. ');"><sup>25</sup></span> is to tell that she cannot establish for herself a regular period during the days of her <i>zibah</i>.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Though menstruation began on the same day in three successive months. ');"><sup>32</sup></span>
טו ואמרת לן עלה אמר רב יהודה אמר שמואל ל"ש אלא ט"ו לטבילתה שהן כ"ב לראיתה דהתם בימי נדתה קאי לה אבל ט"ו לראיתה דבימי זיבתה קאי לא קבעה
15 R. Joseph<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' A disciple of Rab Judah who was the disciple of both Rab and Samuel. ');"><sup>33</sup></span> remarked: I have not heard this traditional explanation.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Attributed to Samuel. ');"><sup>34</sup></span>
טז אמר רב פפא אמריתא לשמעתא קמיה רב יהודה מדסקרתא מקבע לא קבעה מיחש מהו דניחוש לה
16 Said Abaye<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' A disciple of R. Joseph who was often reminding his Master of traditions he had forgotten owing to a serious illness (cf. Ned. 41a). ');"><sup>35</sup></span> to him, You yourself have told it to us,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' 'Before your illness'. ');"><sup>36</sup></span>
יז אישתיק ולא א"ל ולא מידי אמר רב פפא נחזי אנן היתה למודה להיות רואה ליום ט"ו ושינתה ליום כ' זה וזה אסורין
17 and it was in connection with the following that you told it to us: If she was accustomed to observe a flow of menstrual blood on the fifteenth day,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' After undergoing ritual immersion, as will be explained infra. ');"><sup>37</sup></span> and this was changed<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Once. ');"><sup>38</sup></span> to the twentieth day,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' After undergoing ritual immersion, as will be explained infra. ');"><sup>37</sup></span> marital intercourse is forbidden<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In the next two months. ');"><sup>39</sup></span> on both dates.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' It is forbidden on the fifteenth which is the date of her regular period, and it is also forbidden on the twentieth since it is possible that henceforth that day would become her regular period. If in the third month also she experiences the discharge on the twentieth, she establishes thereby a new regular period and henceforth only the twentieth is forbidden while the fifteenth becomes permitted. ');"><sup>40</sup></span> If this was changed twice to the twentieth day,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. p. 271, n. 14. ');"><sup>41</sup></span> marital intercourse is again forbidden on both dates. And in connection with this you have told us: Rab Judah citing Samuel explained. This<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That the fifteenth day is regarded as a regular period that cannot be altered unless the discharge appeared three times in three consecutive months respectively on a different date. ');"><sup>42</sup></span> was learnt only [when she was accustomed to observe a flow] on the fifteenth day after her ritual immersion<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which is performed at the conclusion of the seven days' period of menstruation. ');"><sup>43</sup></span> which is the twenty-second day<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The seven days of menstruation (cf. prev. n.) plus the fifteen days. ');"><sup>44</sup></span> after her observation of her discharge, since on such a day<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'for there'. ');"><sup>45</sup></span> she is already within the days of her menstruation period,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which begins after eighteen days (i.e., the seven days of menstruation plus the eleven, the days of the zibah period) have passed since the first day of the discharge, and continues for seven days. ');"><sup>46</sup></span> but the fifteenth day after her observation, on which she is still within the days of her <i>zibah</i> period,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. prev. n. ');"><sup>47</sup></span> cannot be established as a regular period. R. Papa stated: I recited this tradition before R. Judah of Diskarta [and asked:] Granted that she cannot establish thereby<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' By observing a discharge for three months on the same date during zibah. ');"><sup>48</sup></span> a regular period,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That could not be abolished by less than three observations on a different date in three consecutive months respectively. ');"><sup>49</sup></span> must we take into consideration the possibility of such a regular period?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' So that where a woman observed a discharge on the fifteenth day in each of three consecutive months intercourse on that day should be forbidden in the fourth months on the ground that, despite the zibah period in which the fifteenth day occurs, a regular period may have been established and the discharge would again appear on that date. ');"><sup>50</sup></span> The latter remained silent and said nothing at all. Said R. Papa: Let us look into the matter ourselves. [It has been laid down that] if she was accustomed to observe a flow of menstrual blood on the fifteenth day and this was changed to the twentieth day, marital intercourse is forbidden on both days.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Supra q.v. notes. ');"><sup>51</sup></span>