Niddah 80

פרט לנשחטה בלילה ושנשפך דמה ושיצא דמה חוץ לקלעים שאם עלתה תרד

excluding<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' From the scope of the law in the context that once a sacrifice had been placed upon the altar it must never be removed from it. ');">¹</span> a sacrifice that was slain in the night, whose blood was poured out,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' So that the essential service of sprinkling upon the altar could not be performed with it. ');">²</span> or whose blood was taken outside the hangings,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Sc. the enclosure around the Temple that corresponded to the hangings of the court of the Tabernacle of Moses in the wilderness. ');">³</span>

רבי שמעון אומר

which, even though it was placed upon the altar, must be taken down.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Only the other disqualified sacrifices, enumerated infra in R. Simeon's ruling, must not, according to R. Judah also, be taken down from the altar once they have been put upon it (cf. Zeb. 84b). ');">⁴</span> R. Simeon stated: From the term 'burnt-offering'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. VI, 2. ');">⁵</span> I would only know that the law applied to<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'I have not but'. ');">⁶</span>

עולה אין לי אלא עולה כשרה מנין לרבות שנשחטה בלילה ושנשפך דמה ושיצא דמה חוץ לקלעים והלן והיוצא והטמא והנותר ושנשחט חוץ לזמנו וחוץ למקומו ושקבלו פסולין וזרקו את דמן והנתנין למעלה שנתנן למטה והנתנין למטה שנתנן למעלה והנתנין בחוץ שנתנן בפנים והנתנין בפנים שנתנן בחוץ והפסח והחטאת ששחטן שלא לשמן מנין

a valid burnt-offering; whence, however, the inference for including<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In the scope of the law. ');">⁷</span> one that was slain in the night, whose blood was poured out,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' So that the essential service of sprinkling upon the altar could not be performed with it. ');">⁸</span> whose blood was taken outside the hangings<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Sc. the enclosure around the Temple that corresponded to the hangings of the court of the Tabernacle of Moses in the wilderness. ');">³</span>

ת"ל (ויקרא ו, ב) זאת תורת העולה

or was kept overnight, that was taken out,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Sc. the flesh of a burnt-offering that was taken out and then brought back and placed upon the altar. ');">⁹</span> that was unclean, nothar,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Sacrificial meat that was kept beyond the time allowed for its consumption. ');">¹⁰</span> one slain with the intention of eating it later than its permitted time limit or beyond its permitted place limits, whose blood was received or sprinkled by disqualified men,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Priests who had a blemish, for instance. ');">¹¹</span>

ריבה תורה אחת לכל העולין שאם עלו לא ירדו

those sacrifices whose blood is to be sprinkled above<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The red line around the altar's sides. ');">¹²</span> and was sprinkled below,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The red line around the altar's sides. ');">¹²</span> those whose blood is to be sprinkled below<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The red line around the altar's sides. ');">¹²</span>

יכול שאני מרבה את הרובע והנרבע והמוקצה והנעבד ואתנן והמחיר והכלאים והטרפה ויוצא דופן

and was sprinkled above,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The red line around the altar's sides. ');">¹²</span> those whose blood is to be applied within<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Sc. the inner altar that was placed within the Hekal. ');">¹³</span> and was applied without,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' On the altar in the Temple court. ');">¹⁴</span>

ת"ל זאת

and a paschal lamb and a sin-offering that had not been slain as such?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'not for their name', the man intending them at the time to serve respectively as different kinds of sacrifices. ');">¹⁵</span> Whence, I ask, is the inference? Since it was explicitly said in Scripture, This is the law of the burnt-offering,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. VI, 2, emphasis on 'law'. ');">¹⁶</span> the scope of the law is widened: One law for all that are placed upon the altar, so that once they have been put up they must not be taken down. As one might presume that I also include<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In the scope of the law. ');">⁷</span>

ומה ראית לרבות את אלו ולהוציא את אלו

a beast that covered<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' A woman. ');">¹⁷</span> or was covered,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' By a man. ');">¹⁸</span> that was set aside<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In a special place. ');">¹⁹</span> for an idolatrous purpose, that was worshipped, the hire of a harlot, the price of a dog, kil'ayim, trefah<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' On these terms v. Glos. ');">²⁰</span> and one that had been extracted by means of a caesarean operation, it was explicitly stated, 'This'.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which implies a limitation. ');">²¹</span> But what reason do you see for including<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In the scope of the law. ');">²²</span> the former and for excluding the latter?