Shevuot 10
דתנן המוציא מרשות לרשות חייב מי לא עסקינן דקא מעייל עיולי וקא קרי ליה הוצאה
- Because we learnt: He who carries out from one domain to another domain [on the Sabbath] is guilty.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Shah. 73a.');"><sup>1</sup></span> And are we not concerned there also with bringing in, and yet he calls it hoza'ah.?
ודלמא קא מפיק מרשות היחיד לרשות הרבים אם כן ניתני המוציא מרשות היחיד לרשות הרבים מאי מרשות לרשות דאפילו מרשות הרבים לרשות היחיד
[No!] Perhaps [the Tanna means] carrying out from a private domain to a public domain. - If so, let him say distinctly: He who carries out from a private domain to a public domain [is guilty]; why does he say: 'from one domain to another domain'?
וקא קרי לה הוצאה וטעמא מאי תנא כל עקירת חפץ ממקומו הוצאה קרי לה
Obviously, to include even bringing in from a public domain to a private domain; and he calls it hoza'ah - What is the reason? - The withdrawing of an object from its place the Tanna calls hoza'ah. Rabina said: The Mishnah also lends support to this view, for it states: The laws of carrying [Yezi'oth] on the Sabbath are two, subdivided into four inside; and two, subdivided into four outside: and it goes on to explain haknasah [bringing in]!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The poor man, having withdrawn an object from public territory, stretches out his hand into the house, and hands it to the householder; the poor man is guilty. V. Mishnah, Shah. 2a.');"><sup>2</sup></span>
אמר רבינא מתניתין נמי דיקא דקתני יציאות שבת שתים שהן ארבע בפנים ושתים שהן ארבע בחוץ וקא מפרש הכנסה שמע מינה
This is conclusive. Raba said: The Tanna means domains; there are two kinds of domain<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Public and private, which produce four punishable transgressions, two hoza'oth and two haknasoth. Raba endeavours to explain why the Tanna uses the word yezi'oth and not hoza'oth; and he explains that it means 'goings out', i.e., roads or paths which go out or lead out, and is therefore equivalent to domains (Tosaf) .');"><sup>3</sup></span>
מראות נגעים שנים שהן ארבעה: תנן התם מראות נגעים שנים שהן ארבעה בהרת עזה כשלג שניה לה כסיד ההיכל
the shades of leprous affections are two, subdivided into four: Bahereth intensively white, like snow; secondary to it [i.e., its derivative], Sid ha-hekal; Se'eth like white wool; secondary to it, Kerum bezah.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra Mishnah, note 4. xhrdf');"><sup>5</sup></span> R'Hanina said: the Tanna who stated this Mishnah of leprous affections<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In the form of principals and derivatives, implying that a principal combines with its derivative to form the requisite size of garis, bean, to mark the person thus afflicted a leper.');"><sup>6</sup></span>
שאת כצמר לבן שניה לה כקרום ביצה
is not R'Akiba; for, if it were R'Akiba, then, sin elsewhere he enumerates them one above the other,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' According to their degree of whiteness - Bahereth, Se'eth, Sid, Kerum; holding that two shades, if separated by only one degree, may combine.');"><sup>7</sup></span> Sid hekal cannot combine with any other shade; for, with which shade will you combine it?
א"ר חנינא מאן תנא מראות נגעים דלא כר' עקיבא דאי ר"ע כיון דאמר זו למעלה מזו וזו למעלה מזו א"כ טיהרת סיד היכל מלצרף
Will you combine it with Bahereth? There is Se'eth which is [one degree] higher than it [intervening, Bahereth being two degrees higher].
אי הכי קרום ביצה נמי בהדי מאן ליצרפי' ליצרפיה בהדי שאת איכא סיד דעדיף מיניה ליצרפיה בהדי סיד לאו בר מיניה הוא
If so, Kerum bezah also - with what will you combine it? Will you combine it with Se'eth? There is Sid which is [one degree] higher than it [intervening, Se'eth being two degrees higher]. Will you combine it with Sid? It is not of its kind.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For Sid and Kerum are derivatives of two different principals.');"><sup>8</sup></span>