Yevamot 24

Chapter 24

א הלכתא צרת אילונית מותרת ואפי' הכיר בה ואפילו צרת בתו אילונית
1 The law is that the rival of a woman incapable of procreation is permitted, even though he<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The deceased brother, at the time when he married. ');"><sup>1</sup></span> knew her &nbsp; &nbsp; defect,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And nevertheless consented to the marriage, which is consequently valid, and the woman is his lawful wife. ');"><sup>2</sup></span> and even the rival of one's own daughter who was incapable of procreation [is permitted].<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The rival of a forbidden relative is forbidden only where the latter would have been subject to the precept of the levirate marriage if she had been no relative. In the case of a wife incapable of procreation, however, since she is not subject to the levirate marriage even where she is no relative at all, her rival even where she (the wife) is a forbidden relative, is regarded as the rival of one in relation to whom the precept of levirate marriage is not applicable at all. Cf. [H] quoted by Rashi. ');"><sup>3</sup></span> But what about the expression WERE FOUND<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. p. 61, n. 14. ');"><sup>4</sup></span>
ב ואלא הא דקתני שנמצאו תני שהיו כי אתא רבין אמר ר' יוחנן אחת צרת ממאנת ואחת צרת אילונית ואחת צרת מחזיר גרושתו כולן מותרות
2 in our Mishnah? — Read, 'were'. When Rabin came<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' From Palestine to Babylon. ');"><sup>5</sup></span> he stated in the name of R. Johanan: The rival of a <i>mema'eneth</i>,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. Glos. s.v. mi'un. In this case it refers to one who refused the levir (V. Rashi a.l.). ');"><sup>6</sup></span> the rival of a woman incapable of procreation, as well as the rival of a divorced woman who had been remarried to her former husband,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' After she had been married by a second husband who divorced her or died. ');"><sup>7</sup></span>
ג תני רב ביבי קמיה דרב נחמן שלש נשים משמשות במוך קטנה מעוברת ומניקה קטנה שמא תתעבר ושמא תמות מעוברת שמא תעשה עוברה סנדל מניקה שמא תגמול בנה וימות
3 are all permitted. R. Bebai recited before R. Nahman: <font>Three [categories of] women may<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' [So Rashi. R. Tam: Should use, v. Tosaf s.v. [H] ');"><sup>8</sup></span></font> use an absorbent<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' [H], hackled wool or flax. ');"><sup>9</sup></span> in their marital intercourse:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' To prevent conception. ');"><sup>10</sup></span>
ד ואיזו היא קטנה מבת י"א שנה ויום אחד עד י"ב שנה ויום אחד פחות מכאן ויתר על כן משמשת כדרכה והולכת דברי ר"מ וחכ"א אחת זו ואחת זו משמשת כדרכה והולכת ומן השמים ירחמו משום שנאמר (תהלים קטז, ו) שומר פתאים ה'
4 A minor, a pregnant woman and a nursing woman. The minor,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' May use the absorbent. ');"><sup>11</sup></span> because [otherwise] she might<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'perhaps'. ');"><sup>12</sup></span> become pregnant, and as a result<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' [H] lit., 'a flat fish', i.e., a flat, fish-shaped abortion due to superfetation. ');"><sup>13</sup></span> might die. A pregnant woman,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' May use the absorbent. ');"><sup>11</sup></span>
ה מדקאמר שמא תתעבר ושמא תמות מכלל דאיכא קטנה דמיעברא ולא מתה א"כ מצינו חמותו ממאנת
5 because [otherwise]. she might<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'perhaps'. ');"><sup>12</sup></span> cause her foetus to degenerate into a <i>sandal</i>.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' [H] lit., 'a flat fish', i.e., a flat, fish-shaped abortion due to superfetation. ');"><sup>13</sup></span> A nursing woman,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' May use the absorbent. ');"><sup>11</sup></span> because [otherwise] she might<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'perhaps'. ');"><sup>12</sup></span>
ו ותנן אי אתה יכול לומר בחמותו ואם חמותו ואם חמיו שנמצאו אילונית או שמיאנו אימא שמא תתעבר ותמות
6 have to wean her child prematurely<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Owing to her second conception. ');"><sup>14</sup></span> and this would result in his death. <font>And what is the age of such a minor?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Who is capable of conception but exposed thereby to the danger of death. ');"><sup>15</sup></span></font> From the age of eleven years and one day until the age of twelve years and one day. One who is under,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' When no conception is possible. ');"><sup>16</sup></span> or over this age<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' When pregnancy involves no fatal consequences. ');"><sup>17</sup></span>
ז דאמר רבה בר ליואי גבול יש לה קודם הזמן הזה אינה מתעברת כל עיקר תוך הזמן הזה היא מתה ועוברה מת לאחר זמן הזה היא חיה ועוברה חי
7 must carry on her marital intercourse in the usual manner. This is the opinion of R. Meir. The Sages, however, say: <font>The one as well as the other carries on her marital intercourse in the usual manner</font>, and mercy will be vouchsafed from heaven,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' To save her from danger. ');"><sup>18</sup></span> for it is said in the Scriptures<i> The Lord preserveth the simple</i>.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Ps. CXVI, 6; those who are unable to protect themselves. ');"><sup>19</sup></span> Since it has been stated, 'because she might become pregnant and as a result might die' it may be implied that it is possible for<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'there is'. ');"><sup>20</sup></span> a minor to be pregnant and not die. But, if so, one could imagine a case where<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'we found'. ');"><sup>21</sup></span>
ח איני והא תני רבה בר שמואל אי אתה יכול לומר בחמותו ואם חמותו ואם חמיו שנמצאו אילונית או שמיאנו שכבר ילדו אלא לעולם שמא תתעבר ושמא תמות ואלא קשיא הך
8 a mother-in-law should be in a position to make a declaration of refusal,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In the case, for instance, where the minor gave birth to a child in her twelfth year and that child was betrothed before the year was over. The minor who thus becomes a mother-in-law is entitled to make a declaration of refusal before, and until she enters her thirteenth year. ');"><sup>22</sup></span> whereas we learned, ONE CANNOT SAY OF A MAN'S MOTHER-IN-LAW, THE MOTHER OF HIS MOTHER-IN-LAW AND THE MOTHER OF HIS FATHER-IN-LAW THAT THEY WERE FOUND INCAPABLE OF PROCREATION OR THAT THEY MADE A DECLARATION OF REFUSAL! — Read, 'because she might become pregnant and die';<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., while conception is a matter of doubt, death is a certainty whenever conception happened to take place. ');"><sup>23</sup></span> for Rabbah b. Liwai said: She<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' A minor. ');"><sup>24</sup></span> is subject to an age limitation. Prior to that period<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The age of eleven years and one day to the age of twelve and one day. ');"><sup>25</sup></span>
ט אמר רב ספרא בנים הרי הם כסימנים ואית דאמרי בנים עדיפי מסימנים למאי נפקא מינה דאפילו לרבי יהודה דאמר עד שירבה השחור בבנים מודה
9 she does not conceive at all; during that period<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The age of eleven years and one day to the age of twelve and one day. ');"><sup>25</sup></span> she dies and her embryo dies; after that period<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The age of eleven years and one day to the age of twelve and one day. ');"><sup>25</sup></span> both she and her embryo survive. But is it really so? Surely, Rabbah b. Samuel recited: One cannot say of a man's mother-in-law, the mother of his mother-in-law and the mother of his father-in-law that they were found incapable of procreation or that they made a declaration of refusal, since they have already given birth to children!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Rabbah does not state, 'since they already grew up' but 'gave birth', which proves that even a minor (not yet grown up) is capable of bearing living children. ');"><sup>26</sup></span> — But [the reading], in fact, is, 'because she might become pregnant and as a result might die'. But, [then, the previously mentioned] difficulty remains!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' From here it appears that a minor can bear children while from our Mishnah it follows that she cannot. ');"><sup>27</sup></span> — R. Safra replied: Children are like marks of puberty.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As soon, therefore, as she gave birth to a child the minor is assumed to have passed out of the age of minority into that of puberty. Hence it is impossible for a mother, whatever her age, ever to make a declaration of refusal to which a minor only is entitled. ');"><sup>28</sup></span> Others Say: Children are &nbsp; &nbsp; more conclusive proof than the marks of puberty. What practical difference is there between the two statements? — [It is this: That] even he who follows <font>R. Judah who stated, '[a girl may exercise the right of refusal] until the black<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., the pubic hair. ');"><sup>29</sup></span></font> predominates'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The growth of two hairs which the Rabbis regard as a definite mark of puberty not being considered by R. Judah as conclusive proof. Keth. 36a, B.B. 156a, Nid. 52a. ');"><sup>30</sup></span> admits in the case of children.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That they provide definite proof of puberty irrespective of the state of the hair. ');"><sup>31</sup></span>