יד הדר אמר אימור דא"ר אלעזר היכא דלא חזיא בשעת נפילה אבל היכא דחזיא בשעת נפילה מי אמר
14 at the time she became subject to the levirate marriage;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' R. Eleazar's view was expressed in connection with a woman who had been divorced (and had thus become forbidden to the levir as the 'divorcee of his brother'), and then was remarried, and finally, on the death of her husband, became subject to the levir as the wife of his deceased childless brother (v. infra 108bf). In this case, when the widow became subject to the levirate obligations, she had been already, for a time, forbidden to the levir as the 'divorcee of his brother'. ');"><sup>35</sup></span> did he express such an opinion, however, in the case where she was fit<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' To be married by the levir. ');"><sup>34</sup></span> at the time she became subject to the levirate marriage?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As is the case in the Baraitha cited by R. Hamnuna. The prohibition there arose after she had become subject to the obligations of the levirate. ');"><sup>36</sup></span>