Yoma 58

נהדרה ונהדר ונקמצה ביממא הוא תני לה והוא אמר לה כלי שרת מקדשין אפילו שלא בזמנו

let him put it back and take it again when it is day? - He learnt and explained it: The vessels of ministration render what is in them sacred even outside of the proper time.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Hence it can no more be put back. Since the vessel has sanctified it for the altar, it must not be put back among the remaining part of the meal-offering.');">¹</span> An objection was raised: This is the rule: Whatsoever is offered<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' E.g.,the meal-offerings, the incense.');">²</span>

מיתיבי זה הכלל כל הקרב ביום קדוש ביום וכל הקרב בלילה קדוש בלילה וכל הקרב בין ביום ובין בלילה קדוש בין ביום ובין בלילה קתני מיהת כל הקרב ביום קדוש ביום ביום אין בלילה לא דילמא אינו קדוש ליקרב אבל קדוש ליפסל

up during the day, becomes sanctified by day and whatsoever is offered up during the night becomes sanctified both by day and by night.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The text here corrected in accord with Bah. V. Tem. 14a. [Cur. ed. inserts 'and whatsoever is offered up during the night becomes sanctified by night, and whatsoever is offered up both during the day and during the night becomes sanctified both by day and by night.' As the former can refer only to drink-offerings (V. Ta'an. 2b) which however are offered up also during the day, this passage is omitted and the text corrected accordingly.]');">³</span> At any rate it is taught that whatsoever is offered up during the day becomes sanctified by day only, and not by night?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which means that there is no sanctification but in the proper time.');">⁴</span>

מתיב רבי זירא סידר את הלחם ואת הבזיכין אחר השבת והקטיר את הבזיכין בשבת פסולה

- It may not become sanctified [enough] to be offered up, but it may become sanctified enough to be invalidated.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' [If it tarries overnight without having been offered (V. Zeb. 87a) . The fistful accordingly having been placed in the vessel of ministration at night becomes invalidated with daybreak, and can no longer be put back among the remaining part of the meal-offering.]');">⁵</span> R'Zera raised an objection: If he put in order the shewbread and the [frankincense] clip after the Sabbath and smokes the [contents of] the cups on the [following] Sabbath it is invalid.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' [Because it had not been left on the table for seven days as prescribed, v. Lev. XXIV, 5ff. Var. lec. rightly omit: it is invalid, V. Rashi.]');">⁶</span>

כיצד יעשה יניחנו לשבת הבאה שאפילו עמדה על השלחן ימים רבים אין בכך כלום ואמאי תקדוש ותיפסל

What should he do? He should leave it for the coming Sabbath, for even if it stayed for many days on the table, that does not matter.

אמר רבא מאן דקא מותיב שפיר קא מותיב ואבוה דר' אבין נמי מתניתא קאמר וקסבר לילה אין מחוסר זמן יום מחוסר זמן

But why? It should be sanctified and invalidated?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Through having been set on the table in its proper time.');">⁷</span>

כי מטי בי שמשי תקדוש ותפסול אמר רבינא שקדם וסלקו מר זוטרא ואיתימא רב אשי אמר אפילו תימא בשלא קדם וסלקו כיון שסדרו שלא כמצותו נעשה כמו שסדרו הקוף

- Raba said: He who raised the objection, raised a valid one, and the father of R'Abin is also quoting a Baraitha,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' It is not the case of all Amoraic opinion, which can be refuted by argument. It is an authoritative Tannaitic teaching and a way must be found to bring the present argument in accord with it.');">⁸</span> but it is of the opinion that the night is not considered a wanting<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The day goes after the night, hence it is part of the night, hence the fistful put into the vessel at night is regarded as having been put therein in the proper time and consequently is sanctified properly. Since, however, it is a day-offering it must be burned with the shewbread; however, where there is a whole day wanting, the bread does not become sanctified.');">⁹</span>

זה הכלל היה במקדש בשלמא רגלים משום ניצוצות אלא ידים מאי טעמא אמר רבי אבא זאת אומרת

time, the day however is so considered. But when the night of Sabbath approaches, let it then become at once sanctified and invalidated?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since the night is not considered as 'wanting time', whereas everything that is due during the day and was placed into the sacred vessels in the preceding night, becomes sanctified and invalidated, then, when the eve of second Sabbath comes, let the table sanctify the bread and invalidate it?');">¹⁰</span> - Rabina said: We assume that he removed it before then. Mar Zutra, or as some say, R'Ashi said: You may set the case even if he had not removed it before [Sabbath eve], since, however, he had put it in order at variance with the regulation<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' When it was wanting time.');">¹¹</span> it is as if a monkey had laid it there.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Without any intention, hence the table does not sanctify it, for we consider that since it was placed there without intention, it was technically not placed there at all, hence it becomes neither sanctified nor invalidated.');">¹²</span> THIS WAS THE RULE IN THE TEMPLE etc. : It is quite right that the feet must be washed because of squirtings,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Of urine.');">¹³</span> but why must the hands be washed? - R'Abba said: This teaches us that it is