Zevachim 150
הזאה כל שהוא מטהרת הזאה אינה צריכה שיעור הזאה מחצה כשר ומחצה פסול
<br> sprinkling, no matter how little, cleanses; sprinkling does not require a definite standard; sprinkling [is valid even if the mixture is] half fit and half unfit? - He states [the law] according to R. Eliezer. Alternatively, sprinkling [upon a person] is one thing, while a [blood] application is another. <br>
לדבריו דר"א קאמר ואיבעית אימא הזאה לחוד ונתינה לחוד:
IF THEY WERE MIXED UP WITH A FIRSTLING OR TITHE etc. Rami b. Hama said: According to Beth Shammai, a firstling may not be given as food to menstruant women; what about its substitute? A firstling cannot be redeemed; what about its substitute? A firstling cannot be weighed by the pound; what about its substitute? - Said Raba: It was taught: A firstling and tithe, [even] when they became blemished, effect substitution. and their substitute is like themselves. <br>
נתערבו בבכור ומעשר כו': אמר רמי בר חמא בכור לב"ש אין מאכילין לנדות תמורתו מהו
Rami b. Hama asked: If one dedicated a [blemished] firstling for the Temple repair, can it be weighed by the pound? Is the profit of hekdesh of greater consideration, or is the degradation of the firstling of greater consideration? - Said R. Jose b. Zebida, Come and hear: IF THEY WERE MIXED UP WITH A FIRSTLING OR TITHE, THEY MUST GRAZE UNTIL THEY BECOME UNFIT, AND THEN THEY ARE EATEN AS FIRSTLING OR TITHE. Surely that means that they are not weighed by the pound? - R. Huna and R. Hezekiah, disciples of R. Jeremiah, said: How compare? There you have two sanctities and two bodies, but here you have two sanctities and one body. To this R. Jose b. Abin demurred: What if he said, 'Redeem me a firstling' which he had devoted to Temple repair: Would we heed him? - [If he says,] 'Redeem' - [surely] the Divine Law said that it must not be redeemed! - Rather said R. Ammi: Did he transmit ought save what he possessed? <br>
בכור אינו נפדה תמורתו מהו בכור אינו נשקל בליטרא תמורתו מהו אמר רבא תניא בכור ומעשר משהוממו עושין תמורה ותמורתן כיוצא בהן
ALL [SACRIFICES] CAN BE MIXED UP etc. Why are a sin-offering and a guilt-offering different; [presumably] because one is a male and the other is a female? Then the same applies to a sin-offering and a burnt-offering? - There is the ruler's he-goat. In the case of a guilt-offering too, there is the ruler's he-goat? - One has hair and the other has wool. A Passover-offering and a guilt-offering too cannot be mixed up, for the former is a year old, while the latter is two years old? - There are the nazirite's guilt-offering and the leper's guilt-offering. Alternatively, sometimes a year old looks like a two-year old, and sometimes a two-year old looks like a year old.
בעי רמי בר חמא התפיס בכור לבדק הבית מהו שישקול בליטרא רווחא דהקדש עדיף או דלמא זילותא דבכור עדיף
MISHNAH. IF A GUILT-OFFERING WAS MIXED UP WITH A PEACE-OFFERING, R. SIMEON SAID: THEY MUST BE SLAUGHTERED AT THE NORTH [SIDE OF THE ALTAR] AND EATEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH [THE LAWS OF] THE MORE STRINGENT OF THEM. SAID THEY TO HIM: ONE MUST NOT BRING SACRIFICES TO THE PLACE OF UNFITNESS. IF PIECES [OF FLESH] WERE MIXED UP WITH PIECES [OF FLESH], MOST SACRED SACRIFICES WITH LESSER SACRIFICES, [PIECES] THAT ARE EATEN ONE DAY WITH [THOSE] THAT ARE EATEN TWO DAYS AND ONE NIGHT, THEY MUST BE EATEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH [THE LAWS OF] THE MORE STRINGENT OF THEM. <br>
א"ר יוסי בר זבידא ת"ש נתערבו בבכור ובמעשר ירעו עד שיסתאבו ויאכלו כבכור וכמעשר לאו למימרא דאינו נשקל בליטרא
GEMARA. A Tanna recited before Rab: You must not purchase terumah with the money of seventh-year produce, because you diminish the time allowed for its consumption. The Rabbis stated in Rabbah's presence: This does not agree with R. Simeon, for if it agreed with R. Simeon, surely he maintained: One may bring sacrifices to the place of unfitness. Said he to them: You may say that it agrees even with R. Simeon: That is only when it was done, but not at the very outset. 'But not at the outset'? Abaye raised an objection to him: