Commentary for Bekhorot 13:29

עבורו מן הטמא מי מעברא

Now he describes [in the above passage] the animal as unclean, therein agreeing with R'Simeon,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The language used, 'an unclean animal', in the Baraitha but not 'that which issues from a clean animal', is in accordance with the view of R. Simeon who forbids the offspring as definitely unclean, if it has not marks resembling its mother; and it says here that if it has one mark similar to its mother, it is permitted. Hence, we see that we do not require according to R. Simeon the head etc. to resemble its mother.');">¹¹</span>

Explore commentary for Bekhorot 13:29. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.