Commentary for Bekhorot 73:18
תפשוט מהא דהך קמייתא משמיה דשמואל איתמר דאי משמיה דרב תרתי למה לי
For if it were in the name of Rab, what need is there for the repetition?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' By declaring in the name of Rab that the law is not in accordance with the ruling of R. Jose, R. Hananel indicates that three persons are required, and therefore, if the former statement had been reported in the name of Rab, there would be two similar rulings by the same authority. Hence we can solve the doubt whether R. Jeremiah reported in the name of Rab or Samuel; it must have been in the name of Samuel.');"><sup>7</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bekhorot 73:18. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.