Commentary for Chullin 109:24

הא בהמה גופא שריא

- No; the law is that the animal itself is also forbidden, but only because the Tanna stated in the first clause that it<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Sc. the actual part that was cut off.');">¹²</span>

Explore commentary for Chullin 109:24. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.