Commentary for Chullin 135:31
אלא אי אמרת לא דרישא דוקא ולא דסיפא דוקא למה ליה למתנייה כלל
It was only stated in so far as it affects the part where it is c off.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Thus: if the limb had been withdrawn into the womb, then only that part which had actually emerged would have to be cut off as forbidden meat; but if it had not been withdrawn, then the limb which had emerged plus a little more of that which is within would have to be cut away as forbidden meat.');"><sup>17</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Chullin 135:31. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.