Commentary for Chullin 156:35

לא אם אמרת באם על הבנים שכן לא עשה בה מזומן כשאינו מזומן תאמר באותו ואת בנו שעשה בו מזומן כשאינו מזומן

I am justified in applying the above argument, viz. , there is a prohibition here and there is also a prohibition with regard to 'The dam with the young', just as the prohibition of 'The dam with the young' applies only to the female parent and not to the male, so the prohibition here applies only to the female parent and not to the male! And if you desire to say [anything against this, I submit the following]: [The expression] 'its young' relates to that parent to whom the young clings;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Sc. the dam. u,ut');">¹⁸</span>

Explore commentary for Chullin 156:35. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.