Commentary for Chullin 160:12
שחיטת קדשים שחיטה ראויה היא דהא אי נחר וזריק דם לא מישתרי בשר וכי שחט מישתרי בשר ושחיטה ראויה היא קמ"ל
and why is it invalid?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As the slaughtering of the first animal was no slaughtering, the second is not under the disability of , 'too young', and it is valid for sacrifice, and he who slaughters it most certainly does not incur stripes.');"><sup>2</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Chullin 160:12. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.