Commentary for Chullin 160:13

ולילקי נמי משום לאו דמחוסר זמן דתניא

Indeed you may conclude that it is not in agreement with R'Simeon, Is it not obvious it is so? - It was only necessary [to have said it] on account of the clause dealing with the slaughtering of consecrated animals.

Explore commentary for Chullin 160:13. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.