Commentary for Chullin 161:36

כרת נמי ליחייב

For Raba said: If the dam was an unconsecrated animal and the young a peace-offering, and a man slaughtered first the unconsecrated animal and later [on the same day] the peace-offering, he is not culpable.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For slaughtering 'it and its young', as the warning at the time of the commission of the wrongful act, i.e., when slaughtering the peace-offering, is a dubious warning, for if the blood of this sacrifice will not later be sprinkled upon the altar, the slaughtering is no slaughtering and no wrongful act will have been committed. This statement is obviously only in accordance with R. Simeon's view.');">¹⁶</span>

Explore commentary for Chullin 161:36. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.