Commentary for Chullin 162:1

אלא אפילו שחט עולה ואחר כך שחט חולין פטור שחיטה קמייתא לאו שחיטה בת אכילה היא

but even if he first slaughtered the burnt-offering and later [on the same day] the unconsecrated animal, he also is not culpable, because the first slaughtering was not a slaughtering such as renders the animal fit for food.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For a burnt-offering must be entirely burnt upon the altar, consequently according to R. Simeon the slaughtering of a burnt-offering is no slaughtering for it does not render the flesh permitted to be eaten.');">¹</span>

Explore commentary for Chullin 162:1. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.