Commentary for Chullin 162:19

וצריכא דאי אשמועינן בהא בהא קאמר רבי שמעון בן לקיש אבל בהא אימא מודי ליה לרבי יוחנן

but if he slaughtered the first animal for his table [needs] and the second to idols he is [certainly] not culpable [on the ground of 'It and its young'] for he suffers the heavier penalty.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since he incurs both penalties by the one act, viz., the slaughtering of the second animal to idols, he would only suffer the heavier penalty, namely, death.');">¹¹</span>

Explore commentary for Chullin 162:19. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.