Commentary for Chullin 226:25

א"ל

Or you may say, if you will, that in all cases Samuel is of the opinion that a prohibition cannot be superimposed upon an existing prohibition, but it is different here for the Divine Law expressly allowed it by the expression 'kid'.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which includes the forbidden fat and the animal that died of itself; hence in this case the Torah expressly sanctioned one prohibition to be superimposed upon an already existing prohibition.');">¹⁸</span>

Explore commentary for Chullin 226:25. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.