Commentary for Chullin 226:26

מדאיצטריכא לשמואל למימר בחלב אמו ולא בחלב זכר זכר הוא דלא אתי לכלל אם אבל האי כיון דבא לכלל אם אסור

Or further you may also say, if you will, the one is his own opinion, the other is the opinion of his teacher.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., R. Eliezer, in whose name Samuel had reported the above ruling. He maintains that a prohibition cannot be superimposed upon an existing prohibition. This is not to imply that R. Eliezer was the teacher of Samuel (Rashi) .');">¹⁹</span>

Explore commentary for Chullin 226:26. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.