Commentary for Eruvin 124:2

לא קשיא הא דאיתיה הא דליתיה

deals with the case of a heathen who was at home<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' During the Sabbath in question.');">³</span> while the former<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' From which it follows that a heathen can impose no restrictions upon an individual Israelite if the latter is the only other tenant in their Joint courtyard. Only an Israelite imposes restrictions on other Israelites in connection with the movement of objects from and into the heathen's house.');">¹</span> deals with one who was not at home.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' During the Sabbath in question.');">³</span> But what principle does he<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The author of the Baraitha.');">⁴</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 124:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.