Commentary for Eruvin 124:7

התם דאתי ביומיה

it is a case where he returns on the same day.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Where, for instance, during the first part of he Sabbath he was not far away from his home. If no restrictions upon his fellow tenants had been imposed, even in his absence, they might, after his return, unconsciously have continued the unrestricted use of their courtyard which they enjoyed since the day began. Where, however, the heathen is unable to return on the same day no such precaution is necessary and consequently no restrictions were imposed.');">¹⁶</span> Rab Judah stated in the name of Samuel: The halachah<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Halachah, sc. the ruling may be promulgated in a public discourse. V. following nn.');">¹⁷</span> is in agreement with R'Eliezer B'Jacob; R'Huna stated: The custom<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Minhag, i.e., the ruling may not publicly be announced (cf. prev. n.) but is to be communicated privately to anyone seeking the information.');">¹⁸</span> is in agreement with the ruling of R'Eliezer B'Jacob; while R'Johanan stated: The public act<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Nahagu (cf. prev. two notes) , i.e., the ruling may not be communicated even in private, but if any person acted in agreement with it no objection may be raised against him.');">¹⁹</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 124:7. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.