Commentary for Eruvin 143:1
וחד אמר ביין דכו"ע לא פליגי דבעינן תרתי כי פליגי בפת
while the other maintains that in the case of wine<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since it is unsuitable for shittuf purposes.');"><sup>1</sup></span> no one disputes the ruling that the two<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Both Shittuf and 'erub.');"><sup>2</sup></span> are necessary<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Even the Rabbis agree that wine cannot become effective for 'erub even by way of shittuf for which alone it may be used.');"><sup>3</sup></span> and that they only differ in the case of bread.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That was used either for 'erub or for shittuf, R. Meir maintaining that even in this case one cannot do service for the other.');"><sup>4</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Eruvin 143:1. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.