Commentary for Eruvin 159:13

אמר ליה משל חמותה עירבה לה ומשום דלא זיכתה לה

was that it was done without her<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Her daughter-in-law.');">²⁷</span> knowledge? ' One of the Rabbis, whose name was R'Jacob, told them: 'It was explained to me by R'Johanan that the 'erub was prepared out of her mother-in-law's food and that the reason for the prohibition was that she did not transfer possession to her'.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Thus it has been shown that the question of the necessity for the transfer of possession in the case of an 'erub of Sabbath limits is one in dispute between the Tannas R. Hiyya and R. Ishmael. Rab, by adopting the view of the former, may, therefore, maintain it though it is contrary to a MISHNAH: As to his view on shittuf which is contrary to our Mishnah the explanation might be that Rab is regarded as a Tanna who may well differ from a MISHNAH: V. Tosaf. a.l. for another interpretation.');">²⁸</span> R'Zera requested R'Jacob son of Jacob's daughter:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' His father was unworthy to be named (Rashi) .');">²⁹</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 159:13. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.