Commentary for Eruvin 175:10

הא גופא קשיא אמרת יש גזל בשבת אלמא קניא וחורבה מחזיר לבעלים אלמא לא קניא

and a ruin reverts to its owner.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Sc. the restrictions of the Sabbath cause the ruin, though during the week it is deserted by its owner and used by a neighbour, to revert to the full possession of the former so that the latter may move no objects from, or into it.');">²²</span> But is not this self contradictory? You said: 'A robbery is valid in respect of the Sabbath domain', from which it is clear that possession is acquired;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' By the person who uses it during the week (cf. prev. two nn.) .');">²³</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 175:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.