Commentary for Eruvin 178:10

אבל יש מחיצה ראויה לדירה על הגדול ואין ראויה לדירה על הקטן אפילו קטן שרי לבני גדול מאי טעמא כיון דלא עבוד מחיצה סלוקי סליקו נפשייהו מהכא

is one that is trodden upon,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And is consequently invalid.');">²⁴</span> but if there were no dwellers on the one as well as on the other the use of both roofs is permitted'.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Because the walls, though indistinguishable to one standing on the roofs, are nevertheless deemed to extend upwards which is in fact the ruling of Samuel Supra.');">²⁵</span> 'I', the other replied: 'told you this: They learned this<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That the movement of objects is forbidden on the smaller roof.');">²¹</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 178:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.