Commentary for Eruvin 183:6

התם כיון דמנטרי מאני דבתים בחצר אתי לאפוקי הכא בחורבה כיון דלא מנטרי מאני דחצר בחורבה לא אתי לאפוקי

subject to restrictions.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Neither from the one nor from the other may objects be moved into the ruin.');">²⁴</span> For were you to suggest that both are exempt from restrictions,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Sc. that Rab's (cf. supra p. 636, n. 16) ruling that the ruin 'is also assigned etc.' implies a relaxation of the law and that even from the courtyard in which an 'erub had been prepared the moving of objects into the ruin is permitted.');">²⁵</span> why [I would ask,] is not<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In the ruling of R. Simeon in our Mishnah which, according to Rab's interpretation (supra 91a) 'applies only where no 'erub had been prepared but not where one had been prepared'.');">²⁶</span> a courtyard for which no 'erub had been prepared assigned<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As is the ruin, according to the suggestion.');">²⁷</span> to the courtyard for which one had been prepared?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Sc. why should not the tenants of the latter be permitted to carry objects from their courtyard into the former.');">²⁸</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 183:6. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.