Commentary for Eruvin 191:3

והכא בלעבור שלא בזמנו קמיפלגי תנא קמא סבר לא בעי כוונה ורבן גמליאל סבר לעבור שלא בזמנו בעי כוונה

The first Tanna holds that no intention is required<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra p. 662, n. 10.');">⁶</span> while R'Gamaliel holds that to commit a transgression<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' On the injunction against adding to the commandments. Lit., 'to transgress'.');">⁴</span> when a commandment is performed not at its proper time intention<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' To perform the commandment.');">⁷</span> is necessary.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra p. 662, n. 12.');">³</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 191:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.