Musar for Eruvin 191:3
והכא בלעבור שלא בזמנו קמיפלגי תנא קמא סבר לא בעי כוונה ורבן גמליאל סבר לעבור שלא בזמנו בעי כוונה
The first Tanna holds that no intention is required<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra p. 662, n. 10.');"><sup>6</sup></span> while R'Gamaliel holds that to commit a transgression<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' On the injunction against adding to the commandments. Lit., 'to transgress'.');"><sup>4</sup></span> when a commandment is performed not at its proper time intention<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' To perform the commandment.');"><sup>7</sup></span> is necessary.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra p. 662, n. 12.');"><sup>3</sup></span>
Shenei Luchot HaBerit
Commandment 391 makes it a transgression to cancel the guard of honour of the Temple, since the Torah writes: "ושמרתם את משמרת הקדש," and whenever the verb שמר is used, it implies a negative commandment, i.e. culpability if that שמירה is neglected.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy