Commentary for Eruvin 32:28

שבקת רבנן ועבדת כר' יוסי ברבי יהודה

referred to the permissibility] of allowing them all [the space] they required.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Though it exceeded two beth se'ah. Where, however, such an area is not exceeded the same privilege is extended to an individual also.');">⁶²</span> Where was [the reply] of R'Nahman (or [as] some say, [that of] R'Bibi B'Abaye) stated? - In connection with what we learned: ANY PARTITION THAT IS NOT [MADE UP OF] BOTH VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL [STAKES] IS NO VALID PARTITION; SO R'JOSE SON OF R'JUDAH. Now [it was objected] could R'Jose son of R'Judah have given such a ruling seeing that it was taught: 'An individual and a caravan are subject to the same law as regards [a barrier] of ropes.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' It is permissible in either case though no vertical stakes were put up.');">⁶³</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 32:28. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.