Commentary for Eruvin 97:19

אמר שמואל עירוב משום קנין

but not here where it was originally divided in two parts.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And its division is part of the original scheme.');">³³</span> But what need was there for the two rulings?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Of Samuel. Both being based on the signification of the term ''erub', could not one be deduced from the other?');">³⁴</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 97:19. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.