Commentary for Eruvin 97:20
וא"ת מפני מה אין קונין במעה מפני שאינה מצויה בערבי שבתות
- Both were required. For if we had been informed of the former ruling only<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'there', the case of the man who is particular about his share in the 'erub.');"><sup>35</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Eruvin 97:20. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.