Commentary for Eruvin 97:21
היכא דעירב מיהו לקני
it might have been assumed [that only there is the 'erub invalid] since the man is particular,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In consequence of which the amalgamation (cf. supra p. 340, n. 10) is incomplete.');"><sup>36</sup></span> but not here.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Where the 'erub was deposited in two receptacles, and the friendly association between the residents is in no way affected.');"><sup>37</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Eruvin 97:21. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.