Commentary for Eruvin 97:22

גזירה שמא יאמרו מעה עיקר וזמנין דלא שכיח מעה ולא אתי לאיערובי בפת דאתי עירוב לאיקלקולי

And if we had been informed of the latter ruling only,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'here', the case of an 'erub deposited in two receptacles.');">³⁸</span> it might have been assumed [that only here is the 'erub invalid] since it was intentionally divided,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' A divided 'erub ('combination') being a contradiction in terms.');">³⁹</span>

Explore commentary for Eruvin 97:22. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.