Commentary for Gittin 116:6
ואידך אי טעין אין ואי לא טעין לא:
the rule would be the same in the case of the first [purchaser].<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., this plea would be valid in the mouth of the first purchaser, and a fortiori in that of the second. Why then was not the rule stated in connection with the first? ');"><sup>6</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Gittin 116:6. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.