Reference for Gittin 116:6

ואידך אי טעין אין ואי לא טעין לא:

the rule would be the same in the case of the first [purchaser].<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., this plea would be valid in the mouth of the first purchaser, and a fortiori in that of the second. Why then was not the rule stated in connection with the first? ');">⁶</span>

Jastrow

Jastrow

Jastrow

Jastrow

Jastrow

Jastrow

Jastrow

Jastrow

Jastrow

Jastrow

Jastrow

Jastrow