Commentary for Gittin 169:2
ורבא אמר מחלוקת לאחר התורף דרבי סבר גזרינן אטו לפני התורף ורבנן סברי לא גזרינן אטו לפני התורף אבל לפני התורף דברי הכל פסול
The father of R. Abin recited before R. Zera: 'If he wrote the Get with [the insertion of] a condition, the unanimous ruling is that it is invalid,' [He said to him:] The unanimous ruling is that it is invalid? [How can this be] seeing that there is a dispute on the subject? What you must say is, The unanimous ruling is that it is valid. And in what circumstances? If the words are inserted after the writing of the substantive part. Why did not R. Zera say to him, [Say,] This is invalid, [the ruling then being] according to Rabbi? — [R. Zera reasoned] that the tanna<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The father of R. Abin. ');"><sup>1</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Gittin 169:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.