Commentary for Keritot 34:22

סיפא בשתי חתיכות רישא בחתיכה אחת

Now according to Hiyya B'Rab who holds: As the latter clause refers to two pieces so does also the former refer to two pieces, why this repetition? - [The latter clause is] an explanation [of the former]: IF [A PERSON WAS] IN DOUBT WHETHER HE HAD EATEN HELEB OR NOT.

Explore commentary for Keritot 34:22. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.