Commentary for Keritot 45:27

חתיכת חלב וחתיכת חלב נותר אכל אחת מהן ואין יודע איזה מהן אכל מביא חטאת ואשם תלוי

And should you say they differ as to whether one out of two pieces is required,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra 16b. The first Tanna will hold that if the two pieces were eaten by two persons both will be liable to a suspensive guilt-offering, although when the second one ate his piece the presence of something forbidden was not established; R. Jose will hold that only the first is liable, because of the two pieces before him one was definitely forbidden, but the second is exempt.');">⁹</span>

Explore commentary for Keritot 45:27. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.