Commentary for Keritot 45:32

ר' יוסי אומר

But do not the preceding instances<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In the third instance of the Mishnah it is stated that if one ate both pieces he is liable to a sin-offering (by reason of the heleb present) and to a guilt-offering to expiate the sacrilege he committed. The second piece must, accordingly, have been worth a perutah; why should we not assume the same in the concluding instance?');">¹²</span>

Explore commentary for Keritot 45:32. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.