Commentary for Keritot 53:33

לעולם קסבר

It would seem then that R'Johanan actually gave a ruling on this? - Indeed yes, and he stated it in connection with the following which we learnt: The young of a thank-offering, or the substitutes [of a thank-offering], or if a man set aside [an animal for] his thank-offering and it was lost, and he then set aside another in its stead, [and later the original animal was found] - these do not require the loaves.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which must accompany the thank-offering; v. Lev. VII, 12, 13. V. Men. 79b.');">¹⁷</span>

Explore commentary for Keritot 53:33. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.